2018 BMW X3 vs 2018 Audi Q5 (technical comparison)

author World Auto Evolution   10 мес. назад
36,167 views

88 Like   9 Dislike

Quattro vs xDrive - Audi Q5 gegen BMW X3

Kaum zu glauben, das der QUATTRO bei so einem Test so alt aussieht.

Top 4 Safest SUVs 2018

BMW X3 ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the X3 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. All critical body regions of the passenger dummy were well protected in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection of both the driver and rear passenger was good or adequate, except the chest of the rear dummy, protection of which was rated as marginal, based on chest compression. The X3 scored maximum points in the side barrier test, with good protection of all critical body areas. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal protection, while that of other body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused, with collisions avoided at all test speeds. Volvo XC60 ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the XC60 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection for all critical body areas of the passenger and of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Volvo showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid-barrier test, protection of both dummies was good except for the chest of the rear passenger, protection of which was rated as marginal. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of critical body areas was good and the XC60 scored maximum points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in tests of its functionality at the low-speeds typical of city driving, with collisions avoided at all test speeds. Audi Q5 ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the Q5 remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Audi demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. All critical body regions of the passenger dummy were well protected. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all body regions was good, with the exception of the chest of both dummies and the neck of the rear passenger dummy, protection of which was adequate. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Q5 has, as standard equipment in Europe, Audi PreSense City, an autonomous emergency braking system. In tests at low speeds, typical of city driving, where many whiplash injuries are caused, the system performed well, avoiding collision with the target at all but the highest test speed. Mercedes GLC ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the GLC remained stable in the frontal offset barrier test. The car scored maximum points for its protection of the front passenger dummy, with good protection of all critical body areas. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Mercedes-Benz showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the frontal full-width rigid barrier test, the front driver scored maximum points, with good protection of all body regions. For the rear passenger, protection of the neck was adequate and that of the chest was marginal, the head and femurs being well protected. The GLC scored maximum points in both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, with good protection of all critical areas of the body. The front seats and head restraints provided good protection against whiplash injury in Euro NCAP's tests and a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated the same high level of protection to the occupants of those seats. Autonomous emergency braking is standard on the GLC. Tests showed good performance at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused. New 2017 "SUBSCRIBE NOW" Music Source: NCM Epic Music Ender Guney

5 Things You Should Know Before Buying a 2018 BWW X3 or BMW X3 M40i

The BMW X3 is all new for 2018 and even comes with a hotted-up X3 M40i version. Although the base BMW X3 isn't very compelling, the X3 M40i version brings some much-needed luxury and excitement. Please show your support and subscribe! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=AutoGuideVideo AutoGuide reviews the latest new cars with test drives, car comparisons and shootouts plus coverage of breaking auto industry news, auto shows, rumors, top 10 lists, and spy photos. Help shop for your new car with informative car buying tips and car recall news, and be entertained with feature stories, Top 10s and car review videos.

2018 Audi Q5 1000 Mile in Review

I have put 1000 miles on the Q5! In this video i'll show you all of the things I love about this car and discuss where Audi is going as a brand.

5 Worst Things about the Audi Q5

These are the 5 things I would change about the Audi Q5

Welcome to the technical comparison between 2018 BMW X3 vs 2018 Audi Q5. Please note that this is only a technical comparison, based solely on the technical specifications of both cars. Not a real life BMW X3 vs Audi Q5 review.

In this video, you can find the differences between X3 vs Q5 in the following categories:
➜ External dimensions (length, width, height, wheelbase, ground clearance)
➜ Interior dimensions (head room, legroom, shoulder room)
➜ Cargo volume/luggage compartment
➜ Engine and performance (max power, max torque, top speed, acceleration 0-100 km/h / 0-62 mph)
➜ Price.

★ ★ Our Favorite YouTube Tool TubeBuddy ★ ★
Download TubeBuddy Free Today! ➜ https://www.tubebuddy.com/worldautoevolution

★ Don't forget to Subscribe ➜ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq_A5jZZ8fcbdWzLW6AZHGA?sub_confirmation=1 ★

★ More SUV/Crossover comparisons ➜ https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjhB6mcaT7HbUsxNlaKUoN4WQNvzpHBEm ★

★ ★ Credits: ★ ★
➜ Music: Stellar, MindsEye & Dr. Rinkel, Source: http://freemusicarchive.org/music/MindsEye__Dr_Rinkel/Stellar/MindsEye__Dr_Rinkel_-_Stellar-
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
➜ Images are taken from the manufacturer website.

Thank you for your visit! We hope to see you again!

DISCLAIMER: This video and description may contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, We’ll receive a small commission. This helps support the channel and allows us to continue to make videos like this. Thank you for the support!

2018 BMW X3 technical specification:
Exterior dimensions:
LENGTH: 4708 / 185,4 (mm / inch)
WIDTH: 1891 / 74,4 (mm / inch)
HEIGHT: 1676 / 66 (mm / inch)
WHEELBASE: 2864 / 112,8 (mm / inch)
GROUND CLEARANCE: 204 / 8 (mm / inch)
Interior dimensions:
FRONT HEAD ROOM: 1044 / 41,1 (mm / inch)
FRONT LEG ROOM: 1024 / 40,3 (mm / inch)
FRONT SHOULDER ROOM: 1463 / 57,6 (mm / inch)
REAR HEAD ROOM: 993 / 39,1 (mm / inch)
REAR LEG ROOM: 925 / 36,4 (mm / inch)
REAR SHOULDER ROOM: 1422 / 56 (mm / inch)
Luggage compartment:
SEATS UP (L/VDA): 550
SEATS DOWN (L/VDA): 1.600
SEATS UP (CU.FT./EPA): 28,7
SEATS DOWN (CU.FT./EPA): 62,7
Engines:
DISPLACEMENT / PETROL MIN: 2 liters
DISPLACEMENT / PETROL MAX: 3 liters
DISPLACEMENT / DIESEL MIN: 2 liters
DISPLACEMENT / DIESEL MAX: 3 liters
MAX POWER (MIN, HP/kW): 184 / 135
MAX POWER (MAX, HP/kW): 360 / 265
MAX TORQUE (MIN, Nm/lb.ft.): 290 / 214
MAX TORQUE (MAX, Nm/lb.ft.): 620 / 457
Performance:
TOP SPEED (slowest, km/h / mph): 213 / 132
TOP SPEED (fastest, km/h / mph): 250 / 155
ACCELERATION 0-100 km/h, 0-62 mph (slowest): 8,3
ACCELERATION 0-100 km/h, 0-62 mph (quickest): 4,8
Price:
USA: 42450 USD
Germany: 47250 EUR
GB: 38880 GBP
France: 47700 EUR

2018 Audi Q5 technical specification:
Exterior dimensions:
LENGTH: 4663 / 183,6 (mm / inch)
WIDTH: 1893 / 74,5 (mm / inch)
HEIGHT: 1659 / 65,3 (mm / inch)
WHEELBASE: 2819 / 111 (mm / inch)
GROUND CLEARANCE: 208 / 8,2 (mm / inch)
Interior dimensions:
FRONT HEAD ROOM: 1059 / 41,7 (mm / inch)
FRONT LEG ROOM: 1041 / 41 (mm / inch)
FRONT SHOULDER ROOM: 1466 / 57,7 (mm / inch)
REAR HEAD ROOM: 998 / 39,3 (mm / inch)
REAR LEG ROOM: 960 / 37,8 (mm / inch)
REAR SHOULDER ROOM: 1434 / 56,5 (mm / inch)
Luggage compartment:
SEATS UP (L/VDA): 550
SEATS DOWN (L/VDA): 1550
SEATS UP (CU.FT./EPA): 28,7
SEATS DOWN (CU.FT./EPA): 60,1
Engines:
DISPLACEMENT / PETROL MIN: 2 liters
DISPLACEMENT / PETROL MAX: 3 liters
DISPLACEMENT / DIESEL MIN: 2 liters
DISPLACEMENT / DIESEL MAX: 3 liters
MAX POWER (MIN, HP/kW): 150 / 110
MAX POWER (MAX, HP/kW): 354 / 260
MAX TORQUE (MIN, Nm/lb.ft.): 320 / 236
MAX TORQUE (MAX, Nm/lb.ft.): 620 / 457
Performance:
TOP SPEED (slowest, km/h / mph): 206 / 128
TOP SPEED (fastest, km/h / mph): 250 / 155
ACCELERATION 0-100 km/h, 0-62 mph (slowest): 9,7
ACCELERATION 0-100 km/h, 0-62 mph (quickest): 5,4
Price:
USA: 42475 USD
Germany: 39500 EUR
GB: 37170 GBP
France: 40750 EUR

Comments for video: