2018 BMW X3 vs 2018 Audi Q5 (technical comparison)

author World Auto Evolution   8 мес. назад
34,495 views

86 Like   9 Dislike

Quattro vs xDrive - Audi Q5 gegen BMW X3

Kaum zu glauben, das der QUATTRO bei so einem Test so alt aussieht.

Top 4 Safest SUVs 2018

BMW X3 ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the X3 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. All critical body regions of the passenger dummy were well protected in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection of both the driver and rear passenger was good or adequate, except the chest of the rear dummy, protection of which was rated as marginal, based on chest compression. The X3 scored maximum points in the side barrier test, with good protection of all critical body areas. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal protection, while that of other body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused, with collisions avoided at all test speeds. Volvo XC60 ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the XC60 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection for all critical body areas of the passenger and of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Volvo showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid-barrier test, protection of both dummies was good except for the chest of the rear passenger, protection of which was rated as marginal. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of critical body areas was good and the XC60 scored maximum points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in tests of its functionality at the low-speeds typical of city driving, with collisions avoided at all test speeds. Audi Q5 ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the Q5 remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Audi demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. All critical body regions of the passenger dummy were well protected. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all body regions was good, with the exception of the chest of both dummies and the neck of the rear passenger dummy, protection of which was adequate. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Q5 has, as standard equipment in Europe, Audi PreSense City, an autonomous emergency braking system. In tests at low speeds, typical of city driving, where many whiplash injuries are caused, the system performed well, avoiding collision with the target at all but the highest test speed. Mercedes GLC ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the GLC remained stable in the frontal offset barrier test. The car scored maximum points for its protection of the front passenger dummy, with good protection of all critical body areas. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Mercedes-Benz showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the frontal full-width rigid barrier test, the front driver scored maximum points, with good protection of all body regions. For the rear passenger, protection of the neck was adequate and that of the chest was marginal, the head and femurs being well protected. The GLC scored maximum points in both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, with good protection of all critical areas of the body. The front seats and head restraints provided good protection against whiplash injury in Euro NCAP's tests and a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated the same high level of protection to the occupants of those seats. Autonomous emergency braking is standard on the GLC. Tests showed good performance at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused. New 2017 "SUBSCRIBE NOW" Music Source: NCM Epic Music Ender Guney

Compared! 2019 Acura RDX vs Audi Q5 vs BMW X3 vs Volvo XC60 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC

( http://www.TFLcar.com ) Compared! 2019 Acura RDX vs Audi Q5 vs BMW X3 vs Volvo XC60 Mercedes-Benz GLC ( http://www.patreon.com/tflcar ) Please visit to support TFLcar & TFLtruck. Check us out on: Facebook: ( https://www.facebook.com/tflcar ) Twitter: ( https://www.twitter.com/tflcar ) and now even Truck Videos on YouTube at: The Fast Lane Truck ( http://www.youtube.com/user/tflcar ) and classic cars as well at: TFLClassics ( http://www.youtube.com/user/ClassicsUnleashed )

2018 BMW X3 vs Audi Q5 ► Design & Specifications Comparison

The newest BMW X3 has just revealed. So let's make a comparison between 2018 X3 and Audi Q5 to find the best SAV for your family! Thanks for watching! --------- Hope you enjoy this video and leave your comment bellow. To stay up to date with alot of new Video SUBSCRIBE my channel: https://goo.gl/xgWsDE --------- Car Comparison with all car infomation: https://goo.gl/Qf5D8h BMW series Information: https://goo.gl/hXWoM6 Mercedes series Information: https://goo.gl/fJUwMT Audi series Information: https://goo.gl/sWTVs8 Thanks Again! :)

2018 BMW X3 Review

2018 BMW X3 A popular crossover becomes a more convincing BMW. Buyers’ wild-eyed enthusiasm for compact-luxury SUVs has put the BMW X3 on a trajectory to overtake the X5 and ultimately the 3-series as the brand’s best seller. The model has undergone a redesign for 2018, which sees it get slightly larger—not surprising given that the X1 is on hand, soon to be joined by the new X2, for buyers seeking something smaller. The X3 also becomes a more full-fledged member of the BMW family with its upgraded interior. And at a time when some of the brand’s passenger-car offerings have strayed from BMW’s historically strong dynamics, the new X3 makes an encouraging showing there as well. Highs Chassis tuning like BMWs of old, improved interior, plenty of passenger and cargo space. Lows Imprecise variable-ratio steering, goofy electronic shifter, the entry-level four pales next to the six-cylinder. Tighten Up As before, the X3 is offered with four or six cylinders under the hood, both engines bolstered by a turbocharger. Their configuration and displacement are the same, but both engines are new to the model. Although the 30i designation suggests that BMW’s 3.0-liter inline-six is present, it actually has a 2.0-liter inline-four. (The 28i was the previous four-cylinder X3). The six-cylinder version has been elevated to M Performance status and is now badged X3 M40i. Both models come with an eight-speed automatic and all-wheel drive. The new 2.0-liter sees horsepower increase from 240 to 248, while the torque peak falls slightly, from 260 lb-ft to 258. The B46 powerplant’s output is nothing extraordinary, but the twin-scroll turbo effectively masks any signs of lag, making for precise and predictable throttle response. This engine punches above its weight in other applications (330i, 530i), but here it feels a tad overmatched. There’s nothing to criticize in the nature of its power delivery or its pairing with the eight-speed, but it’s a far cry from the M40i’s silken and muscular inline-six, which boasts 355 horsepower and 369 lb-ft of torque. BMW’s turbo six is an engine from the gods, and the M40i feels as quick as a Porsche Macan GTS. With either engine, the eight-speed automatic, unfortunately, is controlled via BMW’s annoying and unintuitive electronic shifter that is spreading throughout the lineup. We can’t fault the transmission’s behavior, though, which is smooth and responsive. Plus, standard paddle shifters are on hand should the driver want to take control. The X3 30i earns EPA fuel-economy ratings of 22 mpg city and 29 highway, both increases of 1 mpg over the outgoing X3 28i. The city number falls between those of the Audi Q5 (23 mpg) and the all-wheel-drive Mercedes-Benz GLC300 (21 mpg), while the BMW’s highway figure tops both competitors’. The six-cylinder X3 M40i also manages increases of 1 mpg over its predecessor in both EPA measures, with ratings of 20/27 mpg city/highway. More encouragingly, the X3 chassis suffers none of the float or sloppiness that plagues much of the recent BMW lineup. The 30i we drove was fitted with the Dynamic Handling package ($1400), which brought adaptive dampers, Variable Sport Steering, M Sport brakes, and a fourth driving mode—Adaptive—in addition to Eco Pro, Sport, and the default Comfort. Even Comfort mode doesn’t have the wallow we’ve seen in BMWs of late; the X3 is plenty capable in corners. Sport tightens the reins noticeably, which is fine where the roads are glass smooth but might be too much when they’re not. The M40i starts out with a firmer suspension, and our example added the adaptive dampers (a stand-alone option that’s $1000 on the 30i and $700 on the M40i). The net result is that this is a rare modern BMW that doesn’t require you to switch it out of Comfort mode and into Sport the minute you turn it on. The M40i’s body control is exemplary, and even its standard Variable Sport Steering is not overboosted. The variable steering is optional on the X3 30i, however, and there we’d be inclined to skip it. In the lower-spec model, it fails to build effort as you wind on more lock, instead seeming to increase assist; switching to Sport mode increases overall effort, masking this behavior. Luxury and Practicality The X3’s starting price has increased by $2400, mostly because there’s no rear-drive version anymore. (Compared with the previous all-wheel-drive model, the new X3’s price sees a $400 increase.) The X3 30i opens at $43,445—versus $42,475 for the Q5 and $43,045 for the GLC 4Matic, its two most obvious competitors—whereas the X3 M40i starts at $55,295. The new X3 is a well-rounded performer, particularly the M40i, and it also is now a better ambassador for its brand. That’s a good thing, given its increasingly visible role https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2018-bmw-x3-first-drive-reviewRead More "SUBSCRIBE NOW"

Welcome to the technical comparison between 2018 BMW X3 vs 2018 Audi Q5. Please note that this is only a technical comparison, based solely on the technical specifications of both cars. Not a real life BMW X3 vs Audi Q5 review.

In this video, you can find the differences between X3 vs Q5 in the following categories:
➜ External dimensions (length, width, height, wheelbase, ground clearance)
➜ Interior dimensions (head room, legroom, shoulder room)
➜ Cargo volume/luggage compartment
➜ Engine and performance (max power, max torque, top speed, acceleration 0-100 km/h / 0-62 mph)
➜ Price.

★ ★ Our Favorite YouTube Tool TubeBuddy ★ ★
Download TubeBuddy Free Today! ➜ https://www.tubebuddy.com/worldautoevolution

★ Don't forget to Subscribe ➜ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq_A5jZZ8fcbdWzLW6AZHGA?sub_confirmation=1 ★

★ More SUV/Crossover comparisons ➜ https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjhB6mcaT7HbUsxNlaKUoN4WQNvzpHBEm ★

★ ★ Credits: ★ ★
➜ Music: Stellar, MindsEye & Dr. Rinkel, Source: http://freemusicarchive.org/music/MindsEye__Dr_Rinkel/Stellar/MindsEye__Dr_Rinkel_-_Stellar-
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
➜ Images are taken from the manufacturer website.

Thank you for your visit! We hope to see you again!

DISCLAIMER: This video and description may contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, We’ll receive a small commission. This helps support the channel and allows us to continue to make videos like this. Thank you for the support!

2018 BMW X3 technical specification:
Exterior dimensions:
LENGTH: 4708 / 185,4 (mm / inch)
WIDTH: 1891 / 74,4 (mm / inch)
HEIGHT: 1676 / 66 (mm / inch)
WHEELBASE: 2864 / 112,8 (mm / inch)
GROUND CLEARANCE: 204 / 8 (mm / inch)
Interior dimensions:
FRONT HEAD ROOM: 1044 / 41,1 (mm / inch)
FRONT LEG ROOM: 1024 / 40,3 (mm / inch)
FRONT SHOULDER ROOM: 1463 / 57,6 (mm / inch)
REAR HEAD ROOM: 993 / 39,1 (mm / inch)
REAR LEG ROOM: 925 / 36,4 (mm / inch)
REAR SHOULDER ROOM: 1422 / 56 (mm / inch)
Luggage compartment:
SEATS UP (L/VDA): 550
SEATS DOWN (L/VDA): 1.600
SEATS UP (CU.FT./EPA): 28,7
SEATS DOWN (CU.FT./EPA): 62,7
Engines:
DISPLACEMENT / PETROL MIN: 2 liters
DISPLACEMENT / PETROL MAX: 3 liters
DISPLACEMENT / DIESEL MIN: 2 liters
DISPLACEMENT / DIESEL MAX: 3 liters
MAX POWER (MIN, HP/kW): 184 / 135
MAX POWER (MAX, HP/kW): 360 / 265
MAX TORQUE (MIN, Nm/lb.ft.): 290 / 214
MAX TORQUE (MAX, Nm/lb.ft.): 620 / 457
Performance:
TOP SPEED (slowest, km/h / mph): 213 / 132
TOP SPEED (fastest, km/h / mph): 250 / 155
ACCELERATION 0-100 km/h, 0-62 mph (slowest): 8,3
ACCELERATION 0-100 km/h, 0-62 mph (quickest): 4,8
Price:
USA: 42450 USD
Germany: 47250 EUR
GB: 38880 GBP
France: 47700 EUR

2018 Audi Q5 technical specification:
Exterior dimensions:
LENGTH: 4663 / 183,6 (mm / inch)
WIDTH: 1893 / 74,5 (mm / inch)
HEIGHT: 1659 / 65,3 (mm / inch)
WHEELBASE: 2819 / 111 (mm / inch)
GROUND CLEARANCE: 208 / 8,2 (mm / inch)
Interior dimensions:
FRONT HEAD ROOM: 1059 / 41,7 (mm / inch)
FRONT LEG ROOM: 1041 / 41 (mm / inch)
FRONT SHOULDER ROOM: 1466 / 57,7 (mm / inch)
REAR HEAD ROOM: 998 / 39,3 (mm / inch)
REAR LEG ROOM: 960 / 37,8 (mm / inch)
REAR SHOULDER ROOM: 1434 / 56,5 (mm / inch)
Luggage compartment:
SEATS UP (L/VDA): 550
SEATS DOWN (L/VDA): 1550
SEATS UP (CU.FT./EPA): 28,7
SEATS DOWN (CU.FT./EPA): 60,1
Engines:
DISPLACEMENT / PETROL MIN: 2 liters
DISPLACEMENT / PETROL MAX: 3 liters
DISPLACEMENT / DIESEL MIN: 2 liters
DISPLACEMENT / DIESEL MAX: 3 liters
MAX POWER (MIN, HP/kW): 150 / 110
MAX POWER (MAX, HP/kW): 354 / 260
MAX TORQUE (MIN, Nm/lb.ft.): 320 / 236
MAX TORQUE (MAX, Nm/lb.ft.): 620 / 457
Performance:
TOP SPEED (slowest, km/h / mph): 206 / 128
TOP SPEED (fastest, km/h / mph): 250 / 155
ACCELERATION 0-100 km/h, 0-62 mph (slowest): 9,7
ACCELERATION 0-100 km/h, 0-62 mph (quickest): 5,4
Price:
USA: 42475 USD
Germany: 39500 EUR
GB: 37170 GBP
France: 40750 EUR

Comments for video: