2018 BMW X3 vs 2017 BMW X1 - What's the difference? (technical comparison)

author World Auto Evolution   8 мес. назад
22,226 views

48 Like   8 Dislike

BMW X1 vs Mercedes GLA vs Audi Q3 2017 SUV review | Mat Watson Reviews

The compact or small SUV market has rapidly grown over the years as manufactures have produced more practical crossovers ideal for families. I put three of the best head to head in this group test; the brand new Mercedes GLA, based upon the previous A-Class, the luxurious and sport BMW X1 which sports a similar interior to the 2 Series Active Tourer, and finally, the Audi Q3 which received a facelift to keep up to date with SUV rivals. So, which compact SUV will win in this all German affair? Which is the best value for money, and which SUV offers the most amount of space? Find out which car I declare the winner in this 4k in-depth group review! Subscribe to carwow on youtube –  http://www.youtube.com/c/Carwow?sub_confirmation=1 Read our full Mercedes GLA review – https://www.carwow.co.uk/mercedes/gla?utm_source=YouTube&utm_medium=description&utm_campaign=Make-mercedes-Model-gla-Type-review Read our full BMW X1 review – https://www.carwow.co.uk/bmw/x1?utm_source=YouTube&utm_medium=description&utm_campaign=Make-bmw-Model-x1-Type-review Read our full Audi Q3 review – https://www.carwow.co.uk/audi/q3?utm_source=YouTube&utm_medium=description&utm_campaign=Make-audi-Model-q3-Type-review Awkward haggling is a thing of the past with carwow. Choose your perfect car with our configurator tool and let the country’s best dealers compete over you. Compare the five best offers by price, location and dealer ratings and choose the one that’s right for you – no hassle, no haggling, just a great deal. Visit our site to save money on your new car – https://www.carwow.co.uk/

Top 4 Safest SUVs 2018

BMW X3 ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the X3 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. All critical body regions of the passenger dummy were well protected in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection of both the driver and rear passenger was good or adequate, except the chest of the rear dummy, protection of which was rated as marginal, based on chest compression. The X3 scored maximum points in the side barrier test, with good protection of all critical body areas. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal protection, while that of other body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused, with collisions avoided at all test speeds. Volvo XC60 ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the XC60 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection for all critical body areas of the passenger and of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Volvo showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid-barrier test, protection of both dummies was good except for the chest of the rear passenger, protection of which was rated as marginal. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of critical body areas was good and the XC60 scored maximum points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in tests of its functionality at the low-speeds typical of city driving, with collisions avoided at all test speeds. Audi Q5 ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the Q5 remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Audi demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. All critical body regions of the passenger dummy were well protected. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all body regions was good, with the exception of the chest of both dummies and the neck of the rear passenger dummy, protection of which was adequate. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Q5 has, as standard equipment in Europe, Audi PreSense City, an autonomous emergency braking system. In tests at low speeds, typical of city driving, where many whiplash injuries are caused, the system performed well, avoiding collision with the target at all but the highest test speed. Mercedes GLC ADULT OCCUPANT The passenger compartment of the GLC remained stable in the frontal offset barrier test. The car scored maximum points for its protection of the front passenger dummy, with good protection of all critical body areas. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Mercedes-Benz showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the frontal full-width rigid barrier test, the front driver scored maximum points, with good protection of all body regions. For the rear passenger, protection of the neck was adequate and that of the chest was marginal, the head and femurs being well protected. The GLC scored maximum points in both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, with good protection of all critical areas of the body. The front seats and head restraints provided good protection against whiplash injury in Euro NCAP's tests and a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated the same high level of protection to the occupants of those seats. Autonomous emergency braking is standard on the GLC. Tests showed good performance at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused. New 2017 "SUBSCRIBE NOW" Music Source: NCM Epic Music Ender Guney

2018 BMW X1 and X3

Кроссоверы 2018: BMW X1, Hyundai Tucson, Mazda CX5, Toyota RAV4, Subaru Forester, Volkswagen Tiguan

В этом видео, сравнение внедорожных возможностей шести популярных кроссоверов, которые можно купить сейчас в 2018 году в салонах официальных дилеров. 1. BMW X1 / БМВ Икс1 2. Hyundai Tucson / Хендэ Туссан 3. Mazda CX-5 / Мазда Сх5 4. Subaru Forester / Субару Форестер 5. Toyota RAV4 / Тойота Рав 4 6. Volkswagen Tiguan / Фольксваген Тигуан Все автомобили с автоматическими коробками передач, вариатор в случае Forester и RAV4. В программе мероприятий планировалось четыре препятствий, по факту получилось пять. В этом видео нет лютого бездорожья, зато есть именно те условия, для которых и создавались эти автомобили - умеренно пересеченная местность. Пишите в комментариях, видео с битвой каких автомобилей снять в следующем видео? А так же напишите, кто из участников данной битвы, показал лучший и худший результаты. Отдельное спасибо компании Astana Motors, за два автомобиля предоставленных для теста. Hyundai Tucson - http://hyundai.kz/ Toyota RAV4 - http://toyota-almaty.kz/ За кадры с квадракоптера, отдельное спасибо компании - https://store.dji.kz/ __________________________________________________________ Я в социальных сетях: http://vk.com/diyas.valikhan https://instagram.com/diyas_valikhan https://www.facebook.com/diyas.valikhan Вопросы и предложения - diyas.valikhan@gmail.com

Professor vs Trash Talker 1v1 for $100.. EPIC beach court

Subscribe To My Channel - https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=professorlive Subscribe to my NEW VLOG Channel! - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_OKnHf4yy3pg1FRsyxBgLg ▼ Follow Me! ▼ INSTAGRAM - https://www.instagram.com/globalhooper/ FACEBOOK - https://www.facebook.com/professorlive Twitter - https://twitter.com/Professor12 Music/Soundtrack - Bboy Wicket Beat Site: Bboywicketbeats.com Instagram: @Bboywicket

Welcome to the technical comparison between 2018 BMW X3 vs 2017 BMW X1. Please note that this is only a technical comparison, based solely on the technical specifications of both cars. Not a real life BMW X3 vs BMW X1 review.

In this video, you can find the differences between X3 vs X1 in the following categories:
➜ External dimensions (length, width, height, wheelbase, ground clearance)
➜ Interior dimensions (head room, legroom, shoulder room)
➜ Cargo volume/luggage compartment
➜ Engine and performance (max power, max torque, top speed, acceleration 0-100 km/h / 0-62 mph)
➜ Price.

★ ★ Our Favorite YouTube Tool TubeBuddy
Download TubeBuddy Free Today! ➜ https://www.tubebuddy.com/worldautoevolution ★ ★

★ Don't forget to Subscribe ➜ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq_A5jZZ8fcbdWzLW6AZHGA?sub_confirmation=1

★ More SUV/Crossover comparisons ➜ https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjhB6mcaT7HbUsxNlaKUoN4WQNvzpHBEm

★ ★ Credits: ★ ★
➜ Music: Stellar, MindsEye & Dr. Rinkel, Source: http://freemusicarchive.org/music/MindsEye__Dr_Rinkel/Stellar/MindsEye__Dr_Rinkel_-_Stellar-
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
➜ Images are taken from the manufacturer website.

Thank you for your visit! We hope to see you again!

DISCLAIMER: This video and description may contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, We’ll receive a small commission. This help support the channel and allows us to continue to make videos like this. Thank you for the support!

2018 BMW X3 technical specification:
Exterior dimensions:
LENGTH: 4708 / 185,4 (mm / inch)
WIDTH: 1891 / 74,4 (mm / inch)
HEIGHT: 1676 / 66 (mm / inch)
WHEELBASE: 2864 / 112,8 (mm / inch)
GROUND CLEARANCE: 204 / 8 (mm / inch)
Interior dimensions:
FRONT HEAD ROOM: 1044 / 41,1 (mm / inch)
FRONT LEG ROOM: 1024 / 40,3 (mm / inch)
FRONT SHOULDER ROOM: 1463 / 57,6 (mm / inch)
REAR HEAD ROOM: 993 / 39,1 (mm / inch)
REAR LEG ROOM: 925 / 36,4 (mm / inch)
REAR SHOULDER ROOM: 1422 / 56 (mm / inch)
Luggage compartment:
SEATS UP (L/VDA): 550
SEATS DOWN (L/VDA): 1.600
SEATS UP (CU.FT./EPA): 28,7
SEATS DOWN (CU.FT./EPA): 62,7
Engines:
DISPLACEMENT / PETROL MIN: 2 liters
DISPLACEMENT / PETROL MAX: 3 liters
DISPLACEMENT / DIESEL MIN: 2 liters
DISPLACEMENT / DIESEL MAX: 3 liters
MAX POWER (MIN, HP/kW): 184 / 135
MAX POWER (MAX, HP/kW): 360 / 265
MAX TORQUE (MIN, Nm/lb.ft.): 290 / 214
MAX TORQUE (MAX, Nm/lb.ft.): 620 / 457
Performance:
TOP SPEED (slowest, km/h / mph): 213 / 132
TOP SPEED (fastest, km/h / mph): 250 / 155
ACCELERATION 0-100 km/h, 0-62 mph (slowest): 8,3
ACCELERATION 0-100 km/h, 0-62 mph (quickest): 4,8
Price:
USA: 42450 USD
Germany: 47250 EUR
GB: 38880 GBP
France: 47700 EUR

2017 BMW X1 technical specification:
Exterior dimensions:
LENGTH: 4439 / 174,8 (mm / inch)
WIDTH: 1821 / 71,7 (mm / inch)
HEIGHT: 1612 / 63,5 (mm / inch)
WHEELBASE: 2670 / 105,1 (mm / inch)
GROUND CLEARANCE: 183 / 7,2 (mm / inch)
Interior dimensions:
FRONT HEAD ROOM: 1065 / 41,9 (mm / inch)
FRONT LEG ROOM: 1026 / 40,4 (mm / inch)
FRONT SHOULDER ROOM: 1412 / 55,6 (mm / inch)
REAR HEAD ROOM: 1002 / 39,4 (mm / inch)
REAR LEG ROOM: 940 / 37 (mm / inch)
REAR SHOULDER ROOM: 1402 / 55,2 (mm / inch)
Luggage compartment:
SEATS UP (L/VDA): 505
SEATS DOWN (L/VDA): 1505
SEATS UP (CU.FT./EPA): 27,1
SEATS DOWN (CU.FT./EPA): 58,7
Engines:
DISPLACEMENT / PETROL MIN: 1,5 liters
DISPLACEMENT / PETROL MAX: 2 liters
DISPLACEMENT / DIESEL MIN: 1,5 liters
DISPLACEMENT / DIESEL MAX: 2 liters
MAX POWER (MIN, HP/kW): 116 / 85
MAX POWER (MAX, HP/kW): 231 / 170
MAX TORQUE (MIN, Nm/lb.ft.): 220 / 162
MAX TORQUE (MAX, Nm/lb.ft.): 450 / 332
Performance:
TOP SPEED (slowest, km/h / mph): 190 / 118
TOP SPEED (fastest, km/h / mph): 235 / 146
ACCELERATION 0-100 km/h, 0-62 mph (slowest): 11,1
ACCELERATION 0-100 km/h, 0-62 mph (quickest): 6,5
Price:
USA: 33900 USD
Germany: 30800 EUR
GB: 27990 GBP
France: 31800 EUR

Comments for video: